Civilization versus Freedom

Edit: The formatting makes the bulk of the text unpleasing to read. I'll fix it soon.


I thought it might be interesting to share our short papers and discuss some talking points as the year rounds out. I also deprive you of my final few posts and how could I do that?
Comments welcome-post your paper too.
                                                                                                           

Many human beings like to explore the world around them, free of bondage to any

particular place, people, or culture. It appears natural that a person would want to live within a

society that feel morally aligned with or, if not in a society or civilization, in a manner in which

they are operating on their own moral code. In the satirical novel Adventures of Huckleberry

Finn by Mark Twain, this quality is ever so present in the main character, Huckleberry, who

displays a level of discomfort when he has to live a stagnant lifestyle that leads to a rudimentary

existence. Huck shows an inclination to venture in nature, beyond the southern society he does

not feel at home in. Over the course of the novel, we see the youth’s disdain for his society grow,

as he witnesses examples of hypocrisy, deceit and gullibility, and dishonor, while experience

contempt, gilt, and moral confusion and disagreement. It is because of this inner turmoil and

overall unpleasant experience in towns along the Mississippi river, that huckleberry Finn rejects

civilization he was born into, and repels the chance to be socialized in the southern United States.

In Mark Twain’s sequel to the Adventures of Tom Sawyer, the characters in the novel

often display an array of traits the Huckleberry Finn finds unappealing. These characteristics,

usually highlighted in dialogue and huckleberry’s standard chronological narration, are used by

Mark Twain in his social commentary on race, religion, culture, and other nationally discussed

issue of his day. This allows the reader to identify irony, hypocrisy, and contradictions, enabling

them to project their own experiences onto the mind of the characters and interpolate what they

are experience, often when there is insufficient information or an inhibiting factor that does not

allow one to make a conclusion on the matter. These character traits are peppered liberally

throughout the novel, along the reader, casual and academic, to make connections within the

book and draw inferences about their meaning as they apply to real life, for days on end. As a

result of the interconnectedness of Twain’s satirical commentary on southern culture throughout

the novel, one would find it difficult to discuss the issues in any organized fashion in regards to

theme, chronology, or age of character, since parallels are often drawn between the young and

old.

 Twain strings unconscious hypocrisy through the novel, often in the virtuous, pious sense often

found in religion. In the opening chapter we meet the Widow Douglas and her sister Miss

Watson, who try to civilize Huckleberry after graciously taking him in, giving him clothes,

teaching him how to read and write, and making an effort to fix Huck's non-verbal

communication (i.e. posture) and trying to instill selective Christian values in him by relaying

scripture to Huck and having him participate in prayer. Making Huck believe in the benefits of

prayer fails, as Huck states,” Miss Watson . . . took me in the closet and prayed, but nothing

came of it. She told me to pray every day, and whatever I asked for I would get it. But it warn't

so. I tried it" (Twain 11). To the understanding reader, the effort to proselytize Huckleberry is

discredited by either Miss Watson's misconception of the very scriptures and religious practices

she tries to instill in Huck, or her outright lie to deceive Huck and bring him into prayer by

promising that anything he desires will come true. Apart from Miss Watson's error in teaching

Christian values to Huck, on a surface level she would seem like a wholesome person, if it were

not for her ownership of slaves without any apparent qualms. When Huck states that," [T]hey

fetched the niggers in and had prayer”, Strange alarms are set off for the standard modern reader.

However in the south during slavery, people justified their ownership of another person, which

really makes them property as they were most commonly viewed, with flexible interpretation of

scripture and their supposed necessity (which was a manifestation of laziness) for slave labor. In

the context of the period of time released this book, it likely acted as a humorous part of the

novel for abolitionists and those who opposed slavery on a moral ground. This absurdity in

participating in Christian practices with the very same people they have enslaved and treated,

contrary to the gist of a famous scripture, unlike they would want to be treated, is equally as

startling when we meet the aunt and uncle of Tom Sawyer(Huckleberry’s impractical friend)

Sally and Silas. After Huck makes up a lie about an accident, Tom’s Aunt Sally asks feverously

if anyone was hurt Huck replies,” "No'm. Killed a nigger.", to which Aunt Sally retorts, “"Well,

it's lucky; because sometimes people do get hurt . . . last Christmas your uncle Silas was coming

up from Newrleans on the old Lally Rook, and she blowed out a cylinder-head and crippled a

man. And I think he died afterwards. He was a Baptist” (Twain 249). Here we witness this

general backwardness in which religious people, especially the kind, seemingly good hearted

women in the novel, seems purposely placed at the beginning and end of the novel, perhaps to

show that Huckleberry has learned some valuable lessons in his travels to various towns along

the Mississippi, and does not want to endure the same feelings of discomfort in, to him,

unnecessarily complex situations. Compared to life on the raft, as Huckleberry describes it, “[T]

here warn’t no home like a raft, after all. Other places do seem so cramped up and smothery, but

a raft don’t. You feel mighty free and easy and comfortable on a raft” (Twain 139). On the raft

he is free on confinement, as is Jim, who shares the comments with him. It is interesting to note

that Jim and Huckleberry share these sentiments, yet ultimately Jim wants to return to his family,

and Huck does not, because he never had a pleasurable relationship with any people in his family

and, after his father was noted as being dead has no one to return to. Mark Twain also highlights

contradictions in religious beliefs with individuals and behavior, most notably in the feud

between the Grangerfords and Shepherdsons. Although both of these families indulge in the

ownership of slaves, the most bizarre component of their lifestyle is brought forth when Huck

describes the feuding families at church, who “brought their guns with them”.(Twain 128) In

later dialogue, we also find out that the two families are feuding yet no one knows why(Twain

129-130). The author here shows mindless obedience to tradition, and a religious hypocrisy

within the same group of people, hinting that the two characteristics run deep in southern culture.

 Apart from satirical plot points involving religious slave owners, we get to witness the

conniving schemes of the Duke and the Pauper, two conmen that Huck and Jim meet along the

raft and travel with. In Huck’s witnessing of the Duke and Paupers schemes(and the formers

sabotage of the latter) climaxing at the point in which Huckleberry decides to act upon his own

moral conviction, and sabotages the Duke and Pauper’s plans. He fails to escape confrontation

with the two conmen, giving him a valuable experience in the aftermath with those who have

strong disagreements with his actions (Twain 232-234). Throughout the novel the Duke and the

Pauper are painted in a bad light, but one should take the time to distinguish to two conmen

between other authoritative figures in the novel. These two men trick others into giving them

money and manipulate other humans in believing what they want, in a physically safe way. One

could almost conjecture that the Duke and the Pauper are similar to the other slave owners who

have manipulated people in s physically harmful way, keeping them as slaves, ultimately

controlling them with the threat of physical abuse or murder, along with their unaccepted and

dangerous solitude in the south.

After witnessing gut wrenching deceit, and gullibility, dehumanization of the friend he

found in Jim (and others like him, although he still objectifies Jim near the end of the novel,

comparing him to a “watermelon” and a “Sunday-school book” in the same breath [Twain 275]),

it is not surprising that huckleberry rejects civilization, saying he has to leave because,” Aunt

Sally she’s going to adopt me and sivilize me and I can’t stand it. I been there before.” The novel

seems to end pleasantly, with Huckleberry learning valuable lessons about the culture he lives

within, but it is important to question what lessons Huckleberry garners from his experiences

covered in the novel. It is in this last sentence that Mark Twain delivers his last portion of irony,

which he does so eloquently, because Huckleberry is leaving to “Indian Territory” with the very

person that epitomizes all that Huck could have found wrong during his travels, Tom Sawyer.

Tom is hypocritical, unapologetically manipulating and deceitful, pompous, and lacks critical

thinking faculties. In chapter 2, after Tom gathers a group of neighborhood boys to form a gang,

and makes the boys pledge secrecy to the group with their blood, he bribes the boy ”with 5 cents

to keep quiet” illegitimating the idea that the group is held together by trust(Twain 10). Moments

before Huck’s bribery, he shows how susceptible he is to believing written word is true. When

Ben Rogers, the boy in Tom’s gang whom Tom bribes, questions Tom with an alternative to

Tom’s proposed ransom process that he has set out for the gang, Sawyer retorts that it can’t be

done,”[B]ecause it ain’t in the books so –– that’s why”. Two chapters afterwards, Tom relays

aspects of Don Quixote, a novel by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, to Huckleberry with

conviction of its basis in reality. The chapter concludes with Huck, after testing the claims of

Tom sawyer about the outcomes of rubbing a lamp, Huck says ,”It warn’t no use, none of the

genies come. SO then I judged all that stuff was just … one of Tom sawyers lies. I reckoned he

believed in the Arabs and elephants, but as for me I think different. It had all the marks of a

Sunday school” (Twain 15). This is all to telling of an overarching theme in the novel, which is

the credibility of religious beliefs. Huck’s test of Tom’s comments make more sense when we

compare it to his statement about receiving being so after trying it, and in light of sentences in

chapter 8 which he narrates, “Jim said bees wouldn’t sting idiots; but I didn’t believe that

because I had tried them lots of times myself, and they wouldn’t sting me”(Twain 47). Even in

fairness to the subjectivity of the word idiot, which in Twains writing it seems what Huck is

portrayed as(even if Huck claims he is not an idiot in the quote), Huck has a disbelief in certain

purported claims of other around him because he can test them. This is a way for Huck to wager

what is real and what is not, as he partakes in somewhat sloppy, rudimentary quasi science

experiments. By inserting multiple occurrences of Huck’s examination of claims, Mark Twain

likens the claims of prayer benefits to that of fictional writing in Don Quixote, and superstition

of enslaved African Americans. This is not surprising considering, that although he believed in

God, Twain did not believe in holy scriptures such as the Bible (Twain, Bainder, p. 56).

Tom is also portrays cruelty and ignorance that is comparable to that of the southern

adults in the novel. After Huck makes a reasonable objection to Tom’s plan to “save” Jim, Tom

says, “It don’t make no difference how foolish it is, it’s the right way ––and it’s the regular way.

And there ain't no OTHER way, that I heard of, and I’ve read all the books that gives any

information about these things” (Twain 273). For Twain, Tom is used to highlight the childlike

ignorance of religious southerners who claim that the all they know of is all there is, and all they

believe in is all there is to believe in. Tom also dismisses any level of foolishness in his beliefs

and plans, which Mark Twain arguably believes the religious southerners of his day did as well.

Tom’s cruelty is best highlighted in chapter 42, when he reveals that Jim has been free for two

months, undermining the seriousness in which Huckleberry has approached the situation of Jim’s

freedom with. Tom Sawyer has an impractical belief system that is susceptible to any set of

printed words he comes across, and unremorsefully manipulates others for his own adventurous

desires. So in this final sentence, one can see that while Huckleberry Finn consciously repels

socialization and the society he grew up in, he unconsciously plans to embark on a journey with

the very person who shows all the signs of manifesting into one of the very adults he wants to

avoid.

For the small period of time Huck lives with the grangerfords, he seems "normal", largely due in part to the fact that he is around reliable adults and people his age that live under reliable adults in a nuclear household (opposite of Tom). It's almost as if the lack of normal socialization in his life and the "freedom" he has is his biggest constraint in terms of direction and thinking in life because he has no one reliable that acts like a normal person(cross Ms. Watson and her sis, Pap, and Tom off of that list).

Everyone Huck spends time around is either narrow minded, delusional, or of poor moral character(usually all three of these characteristics are grouped or paired with one another, as they are in the characters that Huck spends much of his time with). The person who Huck seems to like isn't even able to be an intentional or unintentional role model or guiding figure(yet) for him because he is a black male in a society with a slaved based agricultural/economic system, something Huck is conscious of(Jim's label). This stigma within the society as a whole is something that Huck has not yet taken down from a point of validation although he displays some feelings, thoughts, and actions that are often against the grain. I think it is important to note that the empathy and change of heart that Huck is capable of is partially due to his lowly position in society and the unsystematic life that he leads.

 Most people you come across are sheep. You are probably one and you might not even realize it, saying, "I'm not like them, I'm not like those people. I'm different".

Yea right.

Sherburn's speech on human nature highlights a very basic but common problem in the actions of people in this 1830's society, those before it, and those after it- the mob mentality. The sheep conversation is one for another post or medium, but it is easily comparable to slavery. People aren't really questioning what they are doing. Of course the (probably not)near lynching occurrence is different from slavery in a number of ways(resistance, incentives, etc.). Huck is one who in this limited way, not adopting a mob mentality. This might be normal for human beings, but in the abstract, nuanced(although not impossible to understand at a decent level), following the heard becomes dangerous(especially when you think you're leading your own way or aren't away you are being hearded, sheered and butchered for resources(sounds nice right)). Not only is it/will it be for the mob, but anyone outside of the mob who gets used as an animal for labor(slaves here). When no-crap-taking shurburn speaks if human nature, he speaks of an all well to known human constraint.

(2 Constraints pictured above is a less lazy(peep earnings) and more comfy(peep pillow and plush animal shoes that were made but some person in a factory who gets paid sh☺t) sheep.)

Instead of revisiting the other topics as I suggested I would, I'm going to go a long with the current of the novel. The developing relationship between Huck and Jim, starting with their run in on the island, is an interesting one to watch in chapters 6-15. Previously after being held captive by his father, Huck hears his father's tirade about slaves and the "govment". As I read what Pap was saying, I began to question what effects these words would have on Huck's psyche. Would he replay his fathers words in his head in an ordinary situation or an odd one in which he has to make a difficult decision? Huck treats Jim as a companion, however up until he apologizes to Jim(or maybe not even at that point), he views Jim as a being not worthy of sincere communication, seen when he says," It was 15 minutes before I could work myself up to go humble myself to a nigger". In reading this I realized that although Jim is no longer physically enslaved, his only interaction with another human because is in the form as if he was one.

Huck Finn 1-5 | Freedom and Enslavement

In the beginning of this novel there are many different levels and forms of freedom and enslavement that some characters seek to attain or escape, while there are other characters that are content with the form of slavery that constrains them (conscious or unconscious of that slavery).

I would like to avoid comparing everyday constraints that are normal in and outside of civilizations. The limit of you knowledge and education is a constraint. Living under someone else’s roof and rules is a commonality and a constraint as well. This barely compares to the forced labor and relations to someone who treats a person as property and an object, a tool to be used, instead of a living, breathing, shitting, and  complex human beings we all are. So as a precursor to further discussion of the novel and its relation to the theme of Freedom and Enslavement, I think automatically treating a desire for Freedom or the hindrance of it to be a result of being enslaved or enslaving someone would be misguided and should be avoided.

Some interesting things I would like to note about this segment of the novel is that, Ms. Douglass is a slave owner and a Christian. I previously stated that I would like to avoid comparisons between everyday constraints and slavery, however religion, in this specific case Christianity, has aspects that can be compared to slavery. In a human to god relationship, the human is subservient to God, and commanded to follow certain rules. There is a punishment if you do not do what is commanded (hell, which seems a bit worse that lashes from a whip) and there is a reward if you follow the commands (you end up in heaven where you basically worship a being to no end for eternity). In this way the relationship of a believer to the believe in deity, if assumed to exist, is slavery in the sense that the believer has to do what is commanded, otherwise they are punished, with no say on the matter. What they receive for obeying rules is an occupation of worshiping a being and doing the will of this deity (again with no say in the matter). If the reality of the believer is assumed to be true, the options of a human being are to obey commands and be rewarded with a forced occupation or role (“labor”) or to be punished (whips, death), for eternity.

I would like to explore the relationship of the two sisters and the idea of slave ownership from their perspective in another post.  I do not yet have an opinion of their intentions with, and views on slavery, as another human being (if they don’t already view them as less than/a lesser human being).

In the next post I will also discuss Huck’s actions with and comments on Jim, and Tom’s view on Jim, and Huck in relation to his treatment of Jim.

The rest of this book

Damn anticlimatic and longer than it needed to be.

 After chapter 9 I said this man chillingsworth is super stoop. Someone must have used leeches to remove his sanity. Reminds me of an idealized doctor of Ms. Hill(s.o. to April, Paul, and Brenda).

In Chapter ten I realize what I later found to be the most important piece on information in the book:
 The black man referenced in the book is not

Your's TRU(tm of 2chainz/Pail)ly

but 

THE DEVIL

Handsome Devil

You can stop reading here.

...

In the first read of Chapter 10 I thought dimm and chillingsworth had..uh..lit the dark plant and that was what caused them to see Pearl outside. However, that probably wouldn't have fit into the way the story was written and made much sense since as far as I know Puritans weren't lightin any L's. It made more sense that she was actually outside the window but I'm curious as to why she wasn't home.

The high preist..badum..

I think Dimmesdale is awfully horrible at playing down a situation. He makes it obviously visible that he is uncomfortable and leaving the room after/during a conversation is no helper in concealing your feelings on a matter. I would say it was dumb but he's letting some strange fat old man be his nurse so..no surprise. He seemed like this from the start..when Hester was in the town square or whatever.

Dimmesdale preaching in chapter 11 made me want to jump a few pages ahead. Sure something important cold have been said, or like in the book, he could have given an inspired sermon. He won't have much leverage on Pearl in terms of moral integrity and teaching values once she gets older. The reverend's sermon in Chapter 12 and ramblings about Pearl and Armageddon lead me to believe they did actually light that dark plant. Man o man.

Need some IcyHot for that chest pain dimmesdale?

I didn't like the rest of the book, or much of the beginning for that matter. It peaked in chapter 8, and the decline was rapid. Hester's character doesn't develop much and I don't get to read about her as much as I'd like. I disliked how the story started with her and what she was going through and then went on to Dimmesdale's probs and the desires of the probing chillingsworth to approve the assumption's he had. THere's more development of Pearl than there is of hester and the world she knows of that surrounds her. interestingly enough, that could have been intended since Pearl was stressed as a living symbol of the scarlet letter, so the title could be a reference to her. I still think the book is poorly organized in character concentration. It was a bit disjointed to me. I didn't care at all about Pearl as I didn't find her interesting.  I second Sam's comment /comparison of hester to the ol girl from twilight, A bit undeveloped and the only side we see is the one that revolves around this situation of being a baby mama(although we get a glimpse of her embroidery skills early on in the book).

One thing I thought about after finishing this book was that I would much rather had the story line shifted backwards to the points leading up to hester and rev d smanging it. Like I said before I thought this dragged on for quite some time. That is probably due to the wack ending of everything turning out wonderfully!!!11!1

My take away from the book: burn it.

This video describes(loosely) how I see the rev trying to get all preachy(on anything including moral integrity and values, like I stated above) with hester and pearl anytime in the future.

The womans stomach is rev d's wrong doing, and seinfield and larry david(white old man) represent hester and pearl respectively.

Enjoy

These Puritan Children Speak Well: The Scarlett Letter Chapters 7-8

Hello again. My last post on this book will be a lengthy one by default so tune in at the end of the week to read it. It shall be a big shibang of sorts.

For those reluctant to read the book, I would recommend finding a free audiobook version like the librivox(sp) ones on youtube, although the one with the big red a in the video(which I am not listening to) is read by a man with a nasally voice. Avoid those videos.

These were chapters I enjoyed going through and thinking about.

I still think these townspeople are stupid and weird when it comes to relinquishing the "custody" Hester has of her child in addition to the rest of the demon-child conversations that seem to be recurring. I don't expect much else though.

Pearl to me,unlike what many of you are saying, seems like a normal child to me. For example, when the children with good grammar try to throw mud at Hester and "the likeness of the Scarlet Letter", she retaliates by screaming and charging them. It works, as the children flee (avoiding confrontation, being pussies, etc..can I say pussies on here?). It's interesting to me that they flee as if they did not expect any sort of confrontation from the two females. Walking down a road is not like standing up in front of the town with a letter on your chest to be attacked. That road is a reasonable fighting ground.

Pearl?

When the two arrive at the reverend's place and Pearl points out the reflection in the armor. I laughed. In my own life things I believe other people find significant about me but that I find to be trivial are often highlighted or become more observable in silly ways such as a distorted reflection. Most of the time, I laugh at it, as I did here. However if it was something I was constantly mistreated for like Hester, I would..err. probably not find it so humorous (we could probably think of a few things if we rewound time a few decades, placed me in a town or two over, or look around enough at what happens in our own school).

This chapter also had a few funny moments. One was Hester's recollection of what her husband used to be and her comparative description of him now, as a "misshapen" man who has become much uglier. She may have also been thinking that he would be better of in the sea instead of on land where eyes have a greater chance of settling on him. Another was when Pearl ran to the ledge and said her mother picked her from a rose bush one day.

At the end of the chapter, in the exchange of actions between Pearl and Dimmesdale, I had a greater suspicion than before that Dimmesdale is the father. She, at such a young age, is still in tune(or relying on rather) her instinct/intuition, and she went to Dimmesdale after rejecting grimy old Wilson. Rev. Dimmesdale had some kind words for the child(whom I think he co-smanged into existence).

Sacrilege, but sweet.

P.S.: What's up with Hobbin's?

The Scarlet Letter Chapters 4-6

*This will be edited and expanded further in the upcoming days*
Chapter 4
This chapter, I hope, is a sign that the book will become progressively more interesting. Chapter four was far better to me than the previous three but to be fair it was only the first 3 chapters.  In the middle of reading it I said, "Wooooooooooooah Hester was married to the physician?" but alas I remembered she was previously married so this "physician" was her husband. Well well well. Aside from his percieved inadequacies as a husband or rather objective honesty, he seemed lame to me. If he felt so strongly that he was not fit for Hester as a husband(objectively), I don't think he would revel in his curiosity so much as to take up a detective case to find the man who was smashin while he was away. I can understand what he's doing though, as this is/was his life, his current wife, and the 1600's when not much else is going on in that town(or neighboring ones for that matter). I can understand that the man is upset that the woman who made vows bore the child of another man as if they were non existent. That's cold, but for some reason unsurprising. If he wishes to find the man who accompanied her in adultery, I would hope he does not have the same chances of doing so as he will in his quest of being a successful alchemist. That would surely be disappointing for him.

Her husband is a walking ghost of sorts, since he is perceived to be dead yet he is alive and has taken up a new identity. This identity is birthed from the perception of his death and the new reality he is living in where his wife is an outcast for having committed adultery. An unfortunate life to live in a Puritan town in the early 1600's.

Chapter 5:
"On the outskirts of the town, within the verge of the peninsula, but not in close vicinity to any other habitation, there was a small thatched cottage. It had been built by an earlier settler, and abandoned, because the soil about it was too sterile for cultivation, while its comparative remoteness put it out of the sphere of that social activity which already marked the habits of the emigrants. It stood on the shore, looking across a basin of the sea at the forest-covered hills, towards the west. A clump of scrubby trees, such as alone grew on the peninsula, did not so much conceal the cottage from view, as seem to denote that here was some object which would fain have been, or at least ought to be, concealed. In this little lonesome dwelling, with some slender means that she possessed, and by the licence of the magistrates, who still kept an inquisitorial watch over her, Hester established herself, with her infant child. A mystic shadow of suspicion immediately attached itself to the spot. Children, too young to comprehend wherefore this woman should be shut out from the sphere of human charities, would creep nigh enough to behold her plying her needle at the cottage-window, or standing in the doorway, or labouring in her little garden, or coming forth along the pathway that led townward, and, discerning the scarlet letter on her breast, would scamper off with a strange contagious fear."

This sounds like a nice life, for her at least. Chapter 5 is a nice contrast to the emotion filled chapter before it where her husband was acting like a mad man. We get to see a side of Hester that shows what she does other than being a single mother in a town that continuously heckles her. We even get to see that she has a "refined" taste in garment aesthetics.

In chapter 6 we get to meet the baby (Jeremy John voice). It's strange how parallel the Puritan community in the book is to towns and neighborhoods in our area today. As I was reading I questioned how much sense it made to believe that I child would be "sinful" like her mother when she had no concept of what these "sins" were. It is interesting though, that the children (however naive and foolish they may be) act like their parents (towards Hester anyway) although I'm not convinced that the attitudes and actions come from a place a visceral as their parents'. I also don't think at that age(or any possibly) is a learned social behavior like rudeness or teasing so much so that is justifies mistreatment of a child (Pearl). It seem's like some of these people aren't thinking..