*This will be edited and expanded further in the upcoming days*
Chapter 4
This chapter, I hope, is a sign that the book will become progressively more interesting. Chapter four was far better to me than the previous three but to be fair it was only the first 3 chapters. In the middle of reading it I said, "Wooooooooooooah Hester was married to the physician?" but alas I remembered she was previously married so this "physician" was her husband. Well well well. Aside from his percieved inadequacies as a husband or rather objective honesty, he seemed lame to me. If he felt so strongly that he was not fit for Hester as a husband(objectively), I don't think he would revel in his curiosity so much as to take up a detective case to find the man who was smashin while he was away. I can understand what he's doing though, as this is/was his life, his current wife, and the 1600's when not much else is going on in that town(or neighboring ones for that matter). I can understand that the man is upset that the woman who made vows bore the child of another man as if they were non existent. That's cold, but for some reason unsurprising. If he wishes to find the man who accompanied her in adultery, I would hope he does not have the same chances of doing so as he will in his quest of being a successful alchemist. That would surely be disappointing for him.
Her husband is a walking ghost of sorts, since he is perceived to be dead yet he is alive and has taken up a new identity. This identity is birthed from the perception of his death and the new reality he is living in where his wife is an outcast for having committed adultery. An unfortunate life to live in a Puritan town in the early 1600's.
Chapter 5:
"On the outskirts of the town, within the verge of the peninsula, but not in close vicinity to any other habitation, there was a small thatched cottage. It had been built by an earlier settler, and abandoned, because the soil about it was too sterile for cultivation, while its comparative remoteness put it out of the sphere of that social activity which already marked the habits of the emigrants. It stood on the shore, looking across a basin of the sea at the forest-covered hills, towards the west. A clump of scrubby trees, such as alone grew on the peninsula, did not so much conceal the cottage from view, as seem to denote that here was some object which would fain have been, or at least ought to be, concealed. In this little lonesome dwelling, with some slender means that she possessed, and by the licence of the magistrates, who still kept an inquisitorial watch over her, Hester established herself, with her infant child. A mystic shadow of suspicion immediately attached itself to the spot. Children, too young to comprehend wherefore this woman should be shut out from the sphere of human charities, would creep nigh enough to behold her plying her needle at the cottage-window, or standing in the doorway, or labouring in her little garden, or coming forth along the pathway that led townward, and, discerning the scarlet letter on her breast, would scamper off with a strange contagious fear."
This sounds like a nice life, for her at least. Chapter 5 is a nice contrast to the emotion filled chapter before it where her husband was acting like a mad man. We get to see a side of Hester that shows what she does other than being a single mother in a town that continuously heckles her. We even get to see that she has a "refined" taste in garment aesthetics.
In chapter 6 we get to meet the baby (Jeremy John voice). It's strange how parallel the Puritan community in the book is to towns and neighborhoods in our area today. As I was reading I questioned how much sense it made to believe that I child would be "sinful" like her mother when she had no concept of what these "sins" were. It is interesting though, that the children (however naive and foolish they may be) act like their parents (towards Hester anyway) although I'm not convinced that the attitudes and actions come from a place a visceral as their parents'. I also don't think at that age(or any possibly) is a learned social behavior like rudeness or teasing so much so that is justifies mistreatment of a child (Pearl). It seem's like some of these people aren't thinking..
Do you think a child should be punished for the parents' sins? If not punished, then maybe judged?
ReplyDeleteI do not think a child should be judge or punished for her parents' "sins", although I thought that was implied in my statements. This situation reminds me of the saying " you don't choose your parents" and to further that, anyone that was born who wasn't a result of your reproduction. If any child could choose I'm not sure how extensive the list of criteria would be and if the would be able to conceptualize a situation similar to one Pearl is in as the daughter of a heckled adulteress. If an adult would judge or even think of punishing a child for actions done by their parents or someone who's actions are outside of the child's control(in this case it PRECEEDS Pearls existence), it would show poorly developed rational of said adult(s) , and a lack of rational thinking(although that may be included in the previous statement.
DeleteI have a good idea. I think we should not only punish people for their crimes, but their children as well because they are related.
Silly.
Hey Jerma! I like how you contrasted Chapter 4 and Chapter 5! Chapter 4 was definitely more emotion based, as Chillingworth's presence and the tension from Hester's immoral and hooliganistic acts really made a sense of urgency and emotion, while Chapter 5 was more objective and reality show-esque, if that makes any sense. :3
ReplyDeleteTy brendaaa
DeleteI completely agree about the story getting more interesting. Clearly Hester shouldn't have cheated on her husband, but don't you think it's kind of justified? I mean, he just left her. Was she supposed to be alone forever? Granted, adultery wasn't the way to go, but she didn't have many options. I like the comparisons you made about her husband.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I would "cheat" on my wife, if I ever wanted one, if I thought she was dead. Not like she was unconcious and i hit up her sister or something to do whatever though..
DeleteI mean, if I were Hester's husband I definitely would not have reacted in the same way. If my husband were to cheat on me while I was away and came home to find some woman with my husband's child, I certainly would not be nursing him back to health. I also agree with Raven. I feel as if Hester shouldn't have been punished as harshly as she was. As far as anyone knew, her husband was dead. Clearly that meant she was single. It makes me think that the townspeople just wanted a new story to talk about and found any excuse to punish somebody.
ReplyDeleteI don't think she should have been punished at all. "Dead". But yes, "death" parted them. I don't think it was just because they wanted a new story to talk about and found any excuse. I would actually disagree with the latter half of that statement as well, and the former a bit as well. They had religious beliefs(they are Puritans, you know), and this was on they strictly adhered to. Oh well.
DeleteI really liked your ideas in this post. I was completely shocked too when I found out about Hester's "husband". I kinda disagree when you say he finds himself not fit as her husband. I interpreted it as him feeling he isn't good enough, but I believe he does love her and him seeking revenge isn't because of curiosity. I think because he's so intelligent and collected that he came off almost as just disinterested or merely "curious".
ReplyDeleteThanks. I don't see anything that would hint him toward loving her except some untold motives and thoughts that aren't displayed(written of). I wouldn't say he's intelligent or collected, and i certainly don't think he was disinterested(otherwise he wouldn't be doing it), but I think the search for her fellow smanger is a ravenous curiosity driven by being away from his society and the thoughts that he has had as a result of finding on she slept and had a babe with some other dude.
DeleteLOL JEREMY you killed me with the Jeremy John Voice!!! and Yah the husband is a very shady character. I like how you made fun of him as an "alchemist" I guess its time to call Ms.Hill back. And although I do agree with April and Raven, its a 1600's community, what else could one possibly expect. And yes I completely agree with you on the topic of Pearl, you just said it that much better.
ReplyDeleteword to ur comment about b hilly the home skilly for rilly my nilly, or nah trillzilly?
DeleteGood comments!
ReplyDelete